Alright. So I went to my sister's high school basketball game last night and I was reminded of something that's bothered me for a long time now. Lady sports teams. There are the Rockets and the Lady Rockets, the Cougars and the Lady Cougars. It's, quite frankly, absurd that so long after the women's rights movement etc. that societal norms like this still exist.I mean, do schools think that people will be confused? "By the way, these are the lady basketball players. We didn't want you to get confused." I mean, why use a qualifier at all? It's not like spectators will sit there and say, "Oh good thing they have 'lady' plastered on their jerseys, otherwise I wouldn't have known!" And, if for practical reasons such as distinguishing the girls' teams from the boys' teams, schools find it necessary to separate them, they should do just that. Call one the men's team and the other the women's team.
But to add a modifier like "lady" is completely unfair and uncalled for. I am reminded of an earlier time where there were doctors and lady doctors, engineers and lady engineers. I do not consider myself a feminist. I do not feel that terms like "history" and "mail" are offensive. But this seems like one term that society can do without. Why separate one set of student athletes from the rest of the school. Are the Lady Trojans any less representative of the school than the Trojans?So I move we strike the practice entirely. If you play for your school, that's all you should be labeled as. A representative of your school, not a female representative. The term is archaic and degrading. If we are to keep saying "Lady Terrapins" then let us also say "Gentlemen Terps." All I suggest is equality.



